Italy is among the many countries that have equipped themselves, or intend to, with increasingly effective legislative instruments to combat what legislators regard as one of the scourges of our time: the alleged resurgence of antisemitism. As is usually the case, the activism of parliaments and governments corresponds to no demand on the part of citizens who, eighty years after the fall of National Socialism and the establishment of the State of Israel in Palestine, are perfectly capable of assessing both antisemitism and the Israeli State project with objectivity and detachment. All the more so given that there are no political forces at the global level whose programs include ethnic or religious hostility toward Jews, in contrast to what has historically been the case. On the contrary, parliaments and governments around the world teem with politicians who place their friendship with Israel above their duties of loyalty to the State of which they are part. Consider the cases of Ted Cruz in the United States or of Argentine President Milei, who never misses an opportunity to boast of being the most Zionist president in the world.
In response to “Mises Institute: Quo Vadis?,” Property and Freedom Journal (March 25, 2026), Professor Hoppe has been removed as a Distinguished Senior Fellow (~2000–2026) with the Ludwig von Mises Institute…
I will not attempt to summarize Hoppe’s above-referenced post regarding where the Mises Institute is going. If you have cared about, or still care about, the Institute, then it is worth a read. I myself had a long association with the Institute until a few years ago. My relationship with the Institute was of great benefit, but it became time for me to move on. [continue reading…]
Yes, Netanyahoo must have been amused by the latest Milei clown show in Israel. But there is another point to be made here. The clown show took place at a rehearsal for the big upoming “Israeli Independence Day” celebration.
Now, the state of Israel did not achieve “independence” in 1948 in the sense that most Americans view their July 4th independence day. There was no war of secession from a tyrannical empire. There was violence, but the violence was perpetrated by Jewish “settlers” on the existing population whose land they were stealing. Murray Rothbard would be the last person in the world to celebrate this as Milei has done. In Rothbard’s words:
Libertarians are opposed to every State. But the State of Israel is uniquely pernicious, because its entire existence rests and continues to rest on a massive expropriation of property and expulsion from the land.
On top of that, the Israeli constitution prohibits private property ownership. All property is held in trust by the Israeli state (in keeping with the first plank of The Communist Manifesto by the way: “Abolition of Private Property”).
This is what Milei was celebrating with his dancing and singing clown show.
Shortly after Obama was elected president a savvy undergraduate student of mine (president of the College Republicans) asked me if the Obama administration intended to call its critics on economic policy and everything else racists in order to shut them up. I said that Obama himself would stay above the sleazy, putrid fray and would have his supporters like the Southern Poverty Law Center do that kind of dirty work. [continue reading…]
PFS’s Doug French last year exposed the Southern Poverty Law Center and similar huxters in “How Movements Turn Into Rackets,” chapter 1 of his book When Movements Become Rackets and Other Swindles: The PFS Trilogy, Stephan Kinsella, ed. (Houston, Texas: Papinian Press and Property and Freedom Society, 2025).1 In his chapter, Doug wrote about [continue reading…]
President of Argentina Javier Milei and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday launched the “Isaac Accords,” a new strategic framework aimed at strengthening cooperation between Argentina, Israel and like-minded partners in the Western Hemisphere.
In an official statement, the Argentine Foreign Ministry detailed that the Isaac Accords constitute a new strategic framework between Argentina, Israel, and “the descendants of Isaac and nations with a Judeo-Christian tradition” in the Western Hemisphere that is designed to strengthen cooperation in the defense of freedom and democracy, and promote the joint fight against terrorism, antisemitism, and drug trafficking.
The first two chapters—my “Preface” and Hans’s “Introduction”—were published the week of Rothbard’s birthday here on the Property and Freedom Podcast (PFP315 and PFP314). The other main chapters will be released sequentially weekly on Mondays. The next in the queue:
My previous piece was about a confused behaviorist masquerading as Austrian, Pierre Garello. Today, I would like to let our readers know that our dear economyth actually had a father, one of much greater grandeur: Let me introduce the great Jacques Garello – who I believe deserved to be upgraded to “econosyth”, given his laser-sharp legacy – and as I bet it will become clear at the end.
This is an interview of Dr. Hoppe by Mikhail Svetov (Михаил Светов) for SVTV (SVETOV TV) on Nov. 3, 2019. From the shownotes:
Conversation with dr. Hans-Hermann Hoppe about corrupting money in politics, perils of democracy, split between Cato Institute and Rothbard, freedom of association and getting libertarianism right.
In 2013, the Mises Institute launched an “Oral History Project” to preserve memories of key figures and events important to our ideas. As David Gordon notes in The History of Our Movement: [continue reading…]
Written in Spanish, above is a post from Lorenzo Cianti on X, celebrating Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s removal as Mises Institute Distinguished Senior Fellow:
SEE YOU SOON, HANS! I’m glad to see that the libertarian movement is distancing itself from toxic figures who praise dictatorial regimes, hate Milei out of prejudice and have tried to silence those who do not share their dogmatism. LONG LIVE FREEDOM, DAMN
As noted here, the 2026 Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Property and Freedom Society will be held from Thursday, September 17, 2026 to Tuesday, September 22, 2026.
To donate with BITCOIN please use the address below. If you would like us to credit your payment (for dues, conference fees, etc.) please email Stephan Kinsella ([email protected]) when you make the bitcoin payment.
17M9V6m5X5Da4vNM5wWLjzcHz9qF36FPk6
“Property does not exist because there are laws, but laws exist because there is property.” — FrédéricBastiat
“Because the concept of property, for instance, is so basic that everyone seems to have some immediate understanding of it, most people never think about it carefully and can, as a consequence, produce at best a very vague definition. But starting from imprecisely stated or assumed definitions and building a complex network of thought upon them can lead only to intellectual disaster. For the original imprecisions and loopholes will then pervade and distort everything derived from them. To avoid this, the concept of property must first be clarified.” —Hans-Hermann Hoppe, TSC, ch. 2
The Property and Freedom Society (PFS; Facebook) stands for an uncompromising intellectual radicalism: for justly acquired private property, freedom of contract, freedom of association—which logically implies the right to not associate with, or to discriminate against—anyone in one's personal and business relations—and unconditional free trade. It condemns imperialism and militarism and their fomenters, and champions peace. It rejects positivism, relativism, and egalitarianism in any form, whether of "outcome" or "opportunity," and it has an outspoken distaste for politics and politicians. As such it seeks to avoid any association with the policies and proponents of interventionism, which Ludwig von Mises identified in 1946 as the fatal flaw in the plan of the many earlier and contemporary attempts by intellectuals alarmed by the rising tide of socialism and totalitarianism to found an anti-socialist ideological movement. Mises wrote: "What these frightened intellectuals did not comprehend was that all those measures of government interference with business which they advocated are abortive. ... There is no middle way. Either the consumers are supreme or the government."
(A more complete statement of our Principles can be found here.)
Follow Us!