6 responses

  1. MichaelC
    September 30, 2012

    Beautiful. When Hans came to speak down under, I also had the pleasure of ‘picking his brain’. Such an intellect. Some topics touched upon; Abortion, Ron Paul, Fallabistic apriorism, strategy (microsecession), seasteading, Mont Perelin Society, Gerad Raditzgy, Popper, Rothbard, Friedman, Reason and Analysis, and Wittgenstein. Definitely won’t forget it.

    Reply

  2. Ed K
    October 3, 2012

    On the web, one finds Jeffery Tucker saying of
    U. S. election politics, “politics create these stupid
    battles between people — for absolutely no reason —
    and wars against the brotherhood of man. They
    create the divisions they pretend to heal.”

    “The casual conversations tend to be about
    everything under the sun, with the exception of
    the usual talk in the U.S. today: presidential
    politics. In fact, I would recommend to
    everyone in the U.S. who is fed up with
    endless disputes between the two ghastly
    choices to move abroad for at least two
    months and return only once it is over.”

    Tucker states, “Politics are only a divisive intrusion —
    you are better able to be friends with others and find
    the good in diversity of thought. You find that
    great, magical, and rare thing: ideas growing and
    expanding because they are leavened by sincerity
    and dedication to seeking the truth.”

    This concept fails the test of reality. First, the battles
    that are referred to as stupid are in fact opportunities
    to present and persuade your concepts, opinions and
    thoughts. Without vigorous and audacious
    presentation of your opinions, do not expect others
    just to understand your concepts and ideas.

    You must win the minds and hearts of others. This
    is accomplished in the arena of politics.

    And second, leaving the U. S. for a critical two months
    leaves a void filled by opportunist and gullible. The
    choice between “the two ghastly choices” needs an
    audacious spokesman presenting the third alternative.

    The divisions of mankind are real. The concept of the
    brotherhood of man brings up Marxism. Recognize that
    some seek to dominate others. That is achieved in socialism.
    Constant compromise with Marxist has resulted in loss
    of freedoms never recovered.

    Failure to present your opinions aggressively might be
    called the Ostrich approach. What is needed is the
    pissed off Lion approach that roars loud enough to
    overcome the media noise.

    Ed Kroposki
    Greenville, SC, USA

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Back to top
mobile desktop